Talk:Exercise 50
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Classification rules== | ==Classification rules== | ||
It comes to my mind that there might be some inconsistencies in the attributes (cats) of the reclassed maps among the last exercises. I classified them all with <number> while the proposed pattern is <number><name>. I'll have to double-check if this is compatible with the colormaps to be applied. [[User:Lburgr|- Levent]] 12:48, 16 January 2011 (CET) | It comes to my mind that there might be some inconsistencies in the attributes (cats) of the reclassed maps among the last exercises. I classified them all with <number> while the proposed pattern is <number><name>. I'll have to double-check if this is compatible with the colormaps to be applied. [[User:Lburgr|- Levent]] 12:48, 16 January 2011 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Colormap== | ||
+ | In the original script the colormap is to be loaded from a style as it would be done for a GDAL layer. As we have a GRASS layer here, this will not work. So i changed the procedure to applying {{typed|text=r.colors.rast}}. [[User:Lburgr|- Levent]] 12:59, 16 January 2011 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 12:59, 16 January 2011
[edit] Geodata_classify.zip
Unfortunately, i can't find the archive in the provided data. I can neither find it anywhere on the trans drive. I used train instead of train_data. - Levent 12:44, 16 January 2011 (CET)
[edit] Classification rules
It comes to my mind that there might be some inconsistencies in the attributes (cats) of the reclassed maps among the last exercises. I classified them all with <number> while the proposed pattern is <number><name>. I'll have to double-check if this is compatible with the colormaps to be applied. - Levent 12:48, 16 January 2011 (CET)
[edit] Colormap
In the original script the colormap is to be loaded from a style as it would be done for a GDAL layer. As we have a GRASS layer here, this will not work. So i changed the procedure to applying r.colors.rast. - Levent 12:59, 16 January 2011 (CET)