Talk:Exercise 50
From AWF-Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Geodata_classify.zip) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Geodata_classify.zip== | ==Geodata_classify.zip== | ||
Unfortunately, i can't find the archive in the provided data. I can neither find it anywhere on the trans drive. I used {{typed|text=train}} instead of {{typed|text=train_data}}. [[User:Lburgr|- Levent]] 12:44, 16 January 2011 (CET) | Unfortunately, i can't find the archive in the provided data. I can neither find it anywhere on the trans drive. I used {{typed|text=train}} instead of {{typed|text=train_data}}. [[User:Lburgr|- Levent]] 12:44, 16 January 2011 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Classification rules== | ||
| + | It comes to my mind that there might be some inconsistencies in the attributes (cats) of the reclassed maps among the last exercises. I classified them all with <number> while the proposed pattern is <number><name>. I'll have to double-check if this is compatible with the colormaps to be applied. [[User:Lburgr|- Levent]] 12:48, 16 January 2011 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 13:48, 16 January 2011
Geodata_classify.zip
Unfortunately, i can't find the archive in the provided data. I can neither find it anywhere on the trans drive. I used train instead of train_data. - Levent 12:44, 16 January 2011 (CET)
Classification rules
It comes to my mind that there might be some inconsistencies in the attributes (cats) of the reclassed maps among the last exercises. I classified them all with <number> while the proposed pattern is <number><name>. I'll have to double-check if this is compatible with the colormaps to be applied. - Levent 12:48, 16 January 2011 (CET)
